|
Disciplinary termination of employment and probative value of emails
Corte di Cassazione, March 15, 2018, no. 6425
Corte
di Cassazione, with judgement no. 6425/2018, expressed its position
upon the probative value of emails without digital signature retrieved
by the employer from the employee’s company account.
Emails belong to the category of electronic documents.
Said electronic documents have full probative value – pursuant to
art. 2702 of Civil Code – only if signed with advanced electronic
signature, qualified or digital. The judge may instead freely evaluate,
pursuant to art. 20, Legislative Decree no. 82/2005, the suitability of
any different electronic document (such as traditional email) to
satisfy the requisite of written form, with respect to its objective
quality, safety, integrity and unchangeability.
Unlawful tender contract: a recap of regulations from the Consiglio di Stato
Consiglio di Stato, no. 1571 of March 12, 2018
With
judgement no. 1571 of March 12, 2018, the Consiglio di Stato, in
application of criteria set by Corte di Cassazione, recaps the most
recurring hints at an unlawful tender contract.
Tender contract are not to be considered “genuine” when the following elements are detected:
a) request by the contracting party of a certain number of work hours;
b) stable insertion of the contractor’s staff in the contracting party’s production cycle;
c) same duties performed by both the contractor’s and the contracting party’s staff;
d) property of structures and tools needed for the performance of duties by the contracting party;
e) the contracting party organizes the activities of the contractor’s employees.
Reduced social contribution for the apprentice also without application of the NCBA
Corte di Cassazione, no. 6428 of March 15, 2018
Corte
di Cassazione, with judgement no. 6428 of March 15, 2018, confirmed
that the peculiar social contribution applied for apprenticeship
contracts is not subject to the employer’s application of
regulations set by national, local or company-based (if any) collective
agreements signed by the most nationwide representative trade unions.
The application of a special, reduce social contribution rate for
apprentices is not considered a social contribution relief (i.e. the
reduction of an otherwise higher rate) but is rather the general rule
set by national law for said employment contract.
Insurance against occupational illness
Corte di Cassazione, no. 5066 of March 5, 2018
Corte
di Cassazione, with order no. 5066/2018, clarified its position on the
existance of an insurance obligation against all illness conditions,
even if different from those officially registered.
Confirming an ancient and consolidated position on the matter, the
Corte specifies that not only the specific risk inherent to the
employee’s duties is relevant, but also the
“improper” specific risk, i.e. not strictly inherent to the
employee’s work but otherwise connected with said work. Such is
the case for preliminary activities, prevention, internal locomotion,
normal pauses and union activities.
Reimbursement request submitted to a locally incompetent office
Corte di Cassazione, no. 5203 of March 6, 2018
Corte
di Cassazione, with judgement no. 5203 of March 6, 2018, confirmed that
the submission of a tax reimbursement request to an office different
from the locally competent one is a suitable action not only to prevent
the loss of the taxpayer’s right to said reimbursement, but also
to determine a silent rejection that may be challenged in court. This
since the incompetent office is held responsible to submit the request
to the locally competent one.
Electronic payslips and their probative value
Corte di Cassazione, no. 6245 of March 14, 2018
Corte
di Cassazione,with order no. 6254 of March 14, 2018, expressed its
position on the probative value of payslips on an electronic support.
The Corte specifies that a paper-based document loaded on an electronic
device is fully suitable for probation purposes, as long as its
conformity to the original is not challenged. Electronic payslips fall
within the scope of art. 2712 of Cicil Code, according to which
photographs and other electronic depictions are suitable to provide
full proof of their content, if the subject against whom they’re
presented doesn’t challenge its conformity to the original.
|
|